The global market for skin boosters, including treatments like injectable skin boosters, is rapidly growing. It is projected to reach $1.96 billion by 2030, with an annual growth rate of 9%. This rise is driven by the increasing demand for minimally invasive procedures that hydrate and rejuvenate the skin, enhancing its natural glow without altering facial features.
Two popular skin boosters, Sunekos and Rejuran, have gained attention for their unique formulations. Sunekos focuses on skin hydration and collagen stimulation, while Rejuran is known for its regenerative properties. Both products aim to improve skin texture and elasticity, offering diverse benefits depending on individual needs.
In this article, we will compare Sunekos and Rejuran, examining their benefits, usage, and ideal candidates to help you make an informed choice.
Key Takeaways
- Sunekos is primarily designed to hydrate the skin, improve elasticity, and stimulate collagen production. It’s ideal for addressing fine lines, wrinkles, and under-eye concerns.
- Rejuran uses polynucleotides to focus on deeper skin repair and regeneration, making it effective for treating acne scars, wrinkles, and other deeper skin issues.
- When comparing Sunekos vs Rejuran, Sunekos excels in surface-level hydration and firmness, while Rejuran works on deep tissue regeneration and long-term skin health.
- Both treatments offer unique benefits based on individual skin concerns, so it’s essential to consult with a medical professional to determine the most suitable option for your needs.
About: Medical Spa RX provides medical practices with premium products at the best prices. If you’re looking to buy Sunekos for your practice, the sales representatives at Medical Spa RX can give you guidance.
Introduction to Sunekos and Rejuran
Sunekos is a popular skin booster designed to rejuvenate the skin by stimulating collagen and elastin production. Its unique formula helps hydrate and tighten the skin, restoring a youthful, radiant appearance. Patients often notice skin texture and elasticity improvements after treatment, as seen in Sunekos before and after pictures, demonstrating its ability to effectively revitalize the skin.
In contrast, Rejuran is renowned for its regenerative properties. It targets deeper layers of the skin to promote healing and reduce fine lines. Its key ingredient, salmon DNA, supports cellular repair, helping to restore the skin from within. Many choose Rejuran for its focus on repairing and strengthening the skin’s structure, making it ideal for long-term skin health improvement.
Active Ingredients
Sunekos relies on a combination of amino acids and hyaluronic acid to deliver its skin-boosting benefits. This blend of amino acids (including glycine, proline, and lysine) plays a crucial role in stimulating collagen and elastin production, which are essential for maintaining skin elasticity and firmness. Meanwhile, hyaluronic acid deeply hydrates the skin, enhancing moisture retention and giving it a youthful, plump appearance.
On the other hand, Rejuran features polynucleotides (PN) derived from salmon DNA as its key ingredient. Polynucleotides are known for their regenerative properties, helping to repair damaged skin by promoting cell turnover and healing. This ingredient works to improve skin texture, reduce fine lines, and restore a healthy, youthful glow.
When comparing the two, Sunekos focuses more on hydration and collagen stimulation, targeting the skin’s surface layers to enhance elasticity and moisture. In contrast, Rejuran emphasizes deep skin repair, using polynucleotides to regenerate damaged tissue and boost long-term skin health.
Mechanism of Action
- Sunekos: Once injected, the amino acids support the formation of new collagen fibers, which improve skin elasticity and firmness, while the hyaluronic acid deeply hydrates the skin. This dual approach helps to smooth fine lines, restore volume, and enhance the skin’s overall texture. The key benefit of Sunekos is its ability to hydrate the skin and promote long-term skin regeneration by boosting the skin’s structural proteins.
- Rejuran: The polynucleotides in Rejuran repair damaged cells, promote cell turnover, and accelerate tissue regeneration. By targeting the deeper layers of the skin, Rejuran improves skin texture, reduces fine lines, and enhances the skin’s natural healing processes. Its focus is on healing from within.
Treatment Areas
Sunekos is primarily used to treat areas with fine lines, wrinkles, and loss of elasticity. Common treatment areas include the face, neck, décolletage, and hands. It’s particularly effective in hydrating the skin, reducing dark circles, and improving overall skin texture and elasticity.
Meanwhile, Rejuran focuses more on skin regeneration and healing. It is often used in areas that require intense repair and anti-aging benefits, such as the face, especially around the eyes and mouth, neck, and even acne scars. Rejuran enhances skin cell turnover, promotes collagen production, and provides a soothing, anti-inflammatory effect.
Benefits and Drawbacks
On Sunekos
- Benefits: Sunekos’ combination of amino acids and hyaluronic acid boosts skin hydration and improves elasticity. By stimulating the production of collagen and elastin, it helps make the skin look younger, firmer, and more radiant. Sunekos is an excellent option for treating fine lines and wrinkles and improving the under-eye area.
- Drawbacks: While beneficial for many, Sunekos may not work equally well for every skin type. Some patients may experience mild side effects like redness, swelling, or discomfort at the injection site. The results, while impressive, may also require a series of treatments to maintain, which can be a drawback for those looking for quick fixes.
On Rejuran
- Benefits: It is particularly effective in repairing damaged skin, reducing fine lines, and improving skin texture through DNA repair. Rejuran is ideal for those with deeper skin concerns, such as acne scars, wrinkles, or sun damage, and helps to strengthen and heal the skin from within.
- Drawbacks: Despite its strong focus on skin regeneration, Rejuran may not deliver highly visible results for certain skin types, particularly those primarily concerned with surface-level hydration or volume. Like Sunekos, some patients may experience mild side effects such as temporary redness or swelling. Rejuran’s results may take longer to appear as they work on deep tissue repair.
Conclusion
Choosing between Sunekos vs Rejuran ultimately depends on your skin’s specific needs. Sunekos is ideal for those looking to firm and hydrate the skin, offering a youthful glow through improved elasticity and moisture. Meanwhile, Rejuran excels in addressing deeper skin concerns, such as repairing damaged tissue and smoothing fine lines.
Both treatments provide unique benefits, so it’s essential to consider your skin goals before making a decision. Whether you’re seeking hydration and firmness or deep regeneration and repair, this comparison can help you select the most suitable option for achieving healthier, more youthful-looking skin.
FAQs
1. How long do the results of Sunekos and Rejuran last?
Sunekos results can last up to six months, while Rejuran offers long-lasting effects due to its deeper tissue repair. Visible improvements typically last several months.
2. What is the main difference between Sunekos and Rejuran?
Sunekos focuses on hydrating and firming the skin by boosting collagen and elastin production. Rejuran, on the other hand, specializes in deep skin repair, using polynucleotides to heal damaged skin.
3. How many sessions are needed for optimal results?
Both Sunekos and Rejuran typically require multiple sessions to achieve optimal results. A healthcare professional can advise on the number of treatments based on your skin’s condition and goals.
References
Skin boosters market size to reach $1.96 billion by 2030. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/press-release/global-skin-boosters-market
Ghatge, A. S., & Ghatge, S. B. (2023). The Effectiveness of Injectable Hyaluronic Acid in Improving Facial Skin Quality: A Systematic Review. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 16, 891–899. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S404248
